The 10 deadliest cancers share one thing: a common metabolic driver. Learn how repurposed drugs can help stop them, and download the free guide by Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Justus R. Hope.
Thanks . The medical cancer business gave me & thousands of women uterine cancer . They prescribed estrogen without progesterone.. my ,my . Then blamed it all on a flawed study …oh gosh .
These bastards reaped millions on surgeries , radiation therapy & chemo .
World wide . I’m so glad there are a few doctors with character & morals .
Thank you R and I am sorry you went through that. But, I am so glad you are still here with us. There are so many variables and so much knowledge we need to arm ourselves with. You're right to be angry at the system that so clearly operates like an assembly line - and a profitable one at that. Macha powder and turmeric powder aren't very profitable by comparison. I hope you are well in NorCal
Hi Julie, I'd love to see where you read that. I could not find any papers suggesting that turmeric can worsen uterine cancer or have a negative impact on estrogen levels.
Thank you. I have Dr. Marik’s book on cancer care & repurposed drugs & recommending to many to have on hand. Let’s hope more attention & funding is given.
Thank you Dena. We are going to release a lot more cancer-related research and guides just like the one featured in this post coming up soon. So happy to have supporters like you
My practice was never cancer-heavy, maybe 3 or 4 times a year, a new patient with cancer. NOW... over the past 3 years, it has exploded with 30% of all new patients with Cancer seeking care. Only downside is that they arrive with stage 4 cancers, near death and wish for me to pull out a miracle cure out of my hat. They had trusted allopathic Oncology to ravage them with chemo, radiation and immunotherapy, all of which in my patient's cases were totally useless and may have even sprung to life new, more virulent cancers. I pray that in the future we will have patients with more faith in alternative therapies and get in faster when they have a fighting chance, not at the 11th hour.
Hi Rachel, ivermectin is primarily metabolized in the liver. It would be best to discuss a plan with a doctor who is aligned before suggesting a treatment plan involving repurposed drugs, ideally. But I will say this, there is a lot one can do besides take ivermectin and fenbendazole: https://imahealth.org/alternative-cancer-treatments-interventions/ check out this list!
Thank you. I noticed that the product LifeOne has at least four of the five things that target the Warburg mechanisms. Are you familiar with it and would you recommend it?
I also have a question about ovarian cancer, stage 1...tumor size of watermelon on ovary was removed and ended up doing a full hysterectomy. Doctors are wanting her to do chemo. Hoping something like this is an option for her instead if she so chooses. Are there any specific things to keep in mind with respect to hormonal cancers like this?
According to a search I did caffeine neutralized Resveratral's anti inflammatory effect on certain cells thus taking away one of the anti cancer mechanisms of action of Resveratral.
That is very interesting! I found the study... well, maybe. It's just one study, but that is an interesting example of the potential for interactions between substances. One might consider taking resveratrol in the evenings to avoid this potential pitfall. If you are interested, we wrote a guide on nutrient timing here: https://imahealth.org/tools-and-guides/nutrient-synergy-guide/ sort of a related topic :-)
What I have read so far in this article sounds more like an advertisement for the continued use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, both of which, according to those who tell the truth about them, are dismal failures in treating cancer, principally because they had a further toxic load to a body with cancer and further weaken a body making it less likely to be able to overcome the cancer.
It's interesting that was your takeaway! Dr. Marik's purpose is to help as many people as possible. Some patients will turn to traditional cancer treatments, and the idea is that repurposed medicines can help those traditional treatments to become more effective. Ultimately, we have to work within the existing oncology landscape.
Why is it necessary to work within the existing oncology landscape, which depends entirely on using toxic drugs that themselves cause cancer and weaken the immune system, thereby making it entirely unlikely they won't contribute to any cure, which the current protocols of chemotherapy and radiation do not provide? There are people who have had much more success in curing cancer, with the most notable exception to my knowledge being that of Royal Rife, who invented a microscope that was able to see live images at 15,000 times magnification and with which he identified particles associated with cancer for which he also developed a treatment with frequency tailored to each different particle he observed. If you haven't heard of Royal Rife, it's because the American Medical Association at the time in the 1930s confiscated all of his equipment and hounded him for the rest of his life, preventing him from giving this gift to the world. His story is told in a book called the cancer cure that worked. I also remember reading in a book about a survey asking oncologists if they would treat cancer with chemotherapy if they were diagnosed with such, and 75% of those asked said they would not.
Well Michael, to answer your question: we do hope to influence this field to change. That's the entire point of Cancer Care. The difficult and frustrating reality is that most oncologists stick to traditional treatments and nothing else. So, we are trying little by little to nudge things in the right direction
Protocol is too limited and I suspect therefore not great possibly even shill mislead as many are getting one to over focus on limited supplements too limited benefits= unnecessarily weak obviously w so many fine anti cancer tackons that might as well be added ie all of us eat 40+ foods regularly,why can't we adjust best longer list when cancer=duh!
We'll be expanding our guidance soon. Research takes time and it's worth pointing out that we are moving far more quickly than typical cancer research does! Have a look here: https://imahealth.org/research/cancer-care/ we may have more there than you think
Greg's is known for looking for the critical edge, improvements possible...again not determined your not legit just immediate take...indeed those 5-6 items, supplements mainly good but very pharma beholden with them owning most supp.companies...
There's a gatekeeper of angelic death like hold on the cancer field at a supernatural level preventing logic,reason,progress from occuring beyond mere corruptions I've noticed and felt in my own mind,spirit behaviors when I set myself against it's awesome sickening ,killing powers..things will get blurred,obscured,even demotivated ie research applications even with death on line motivations of self or loved ones..true reaper like stuff if delusion spirit ancient rep.goin on I tell you..so forgive my critisizms where I might be in off too far with you..I only glanced and gave initial potential take..may you do well if your ambitions to heal God's people are true!
Further,there is advantage to a shorter,concise protocol of best that could be handled easier,similar too a short mainstream Drs prescription with exact dosing of less then a half dozen items...
Although full dozen to 2 dozen list will perform better it's no good if majority won't begin it due to complications of it, financing,etc.. ultimately shirt list could heal more at half or less healing power see?
So tailoring important to individual or..ideally offer 3 programs short, medium,long and expensive, finely tuned list and compare results...likely long is going to win it but all on board w 3 tier plan...also you can keep adding to 3rd tier list any and everything which is fun , interesting..if any items begin to outperform 1st tier mainstay you replace that one!-What do you think?
Excellent, thank you . I pray it becomes part of mainstream medicine. 🙌🏼
We are working hard to make sure that happens. Thank you for your support!
Thanks . The medical cancer business gave me & thousands of women uterine cancer . They prescribed estrogen without progesterone.. my ,my . Then blamed it all on a flawed study …oh gosh .
These bastards reaped millions on surgeries , radiation therapy & chemo .
World wide . I’m so glad there are a few doctors with character & morals .
Thank you R and I am sorry you went through that. But, I am so glad you are still here with us. There are so many variables and so much knowledge we need to arm ourselves with. You're right to be angry at the system that so clearly operates like an assembly line - and a profitable one at that. Macha powder and turmeric powder aren't very profitable by comparison. I hope you are well in NorCal
I just read that Tumeric is not advisable to use with women who have uterine cancer or is estrogen dominant. Is that true?
Hi Julie, I'd love to see where you read that. I could not find any papers suggesting that turmeric can worsen uterine cancer or have a negative impact on estrogen levels.
My mom had this cancer … not sure if it was the cancer that killed her. However, I KNOW that the two chemo’s given to her were ….
I'm sorry Sheri. You are not alone
😓 thank you for your response. I wish it on no one. None of it!
There was also my dad’s brother n his wife with lunch cancer and a sister with breast cancer… none of it fair!
Thank you. I have Dr. Marik’s book on cancer care & repurposed drugs & recommending to many to have on hand. Let’s hope more attention & funding is given.
Thank you Dena. We are going to release a lot more cancer-related research and guides just like the one featured in this post coming up soon. So happy to have supporters like you
My practice was never cancer-heavy, maybe 3 or 4 times a year, a new patient with cancer. NOW... over the past 3 years, it has exploded with 30% of all new patients with Cancer seeking care. Only downside is that they arrive with stage 4 cancers, near death and wish for me to pull out a miracle cure out of my hat. They had trusted allopathic Oncology to ravage them with chemo, radiation and immunotherapy, all of which in my patient's cases were totally useless and may have even sprung to life new, more virulent cancers. I pray that in the future we will have patients with more faith in alternative therapies and get in faster when they have a fighting chance, not at the 11th hour.
Thank you Dr. Saleeby, we echo your sentiments entirely!
If someone is unable to take Ivermectin (and maybe Fenbendazole) because of pre existing kidney problems, what do you suggest?
Hi Rachel, ivermectin is primarily metabolized in the liver. It would be best to discuss a plan with a doctor who is aligned before suggesting a treatment plan involving repurposed drugs, ideally. But I will say this, there is a lot one can do besides take ivermectin and fenbendazole: https://imahealth.org/alternative-cancer-treatments-interventions/ check out this list!
Thank you. I noticed that the product LifeOne has at least four of the five things that target the Warburg mechanisms. Are you familiar with it and would you recommend it?
I also have a question about ovarian cancer, stage 1...tumor size of watermelon on ovary was removed and ended up doing a full hysterectomy. Doctors are wanting her to do chemo. Hoping something like this is an option for her instead if she so chooses. Are there any specific things to keep in mind with respect to hormonal cancers like this?
According to a search I did caffeine neutralized Resveratral's anti inflammatory effect on certain cells thus taking away one of the anti cancer mechanisms of action of Resveratral.
That is very interesting! I found the study... well, maybe. It's just one study, but that is an interesting example of the potential for interactions between substances. One might consider taking resveratrol in the evenings to avoid this potential pitfall. If you are interested, we wrote a guide on nutrient timing here: https://imahealth.org/tools-and-guides/nutrient-synergy-guide/ sort of a related topic :-)
Thanks.
Don't forget about the CYP and PGP affects of supplements and how they affect meds.
Some are stronger than others.
Grapefruit juice is probably the strongest CYP inhibitor.
That is an excellent point! We'll be sure to cover that coming up soon.
"Resveratrol" is misspelled in Tables 1 and 3.
Thank you; we have updated those. Very much appreciated!
Acknowledgement appreciated.
What I have read so far in this article sounds more like an advertisement for the continued use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, both of which, according to those who tell the truth about them, are dismal failures in treating cancer, principally because they had a further toxic load to a body with cancer and further weaken a body making it less likely to be able to overcome the cancer.
It's interesting that was your takeaway! Dr. Marik's purpose is to help as many people as possible. Some patients will turn to traditional cancer treatments, and the idea is that repurposed medicines can help those traditional treatments to become more effective. Ultimately, we have to work within the existing oncology landscape.
Why is it necessary to work within the existing oncology landscape, which depends entirely on using toxic drugs that themselves cause cancer and weaken the immune system, thereby making it entirely unlikely they won't contribute to any cure, which the current protocols of chemotherapy and radiation do not provide? There are people who have had much more success in curing cancer, with the most notable exception to my knowledge being that of Royal Rife, who invented a microscope that was able to see live images at 15,000 times magnification and with which he identified particles associated with cancer for which he also developed a treatment with frequency tailored to each different particle he observed. If you haven't heard of Royal Rife, it's because the American Medical Association at the time in the 1930s confiscated all of his equipment and hounded him for the rest of his life, preventing him from giving this gift to the world. His story is told in a book called the cancer cure that worked. I also remember reading in a book about a survey asking oncologists if they would treat cancer with chemotherapy if they were diagnosed with such, and 75% of those asked said they would not.
Well Michael, to answer your question: we do hope to influence this field to change. That's the entire point of Cancer Care. The difficult and frustrating reality is that most oncologists stick to traditional treatments and nothing else. So, we are trying little by little to nudge things in the right direction
The Download link seems to be broken.
Thank you Dave, got that fixed up now
Protocol is too limited and I suspect therefore not great possibly even shill mislead as many are getting one to over focus on limited supplements too limited benefits= unnecessarily weak obviously w so many fine anti cancer tackons that might as well be added ie all of us eat 40+ foods regularly,why can't we adjust best longer list when cancer=duh!
We'll be expanding our guidance soon. Research takes time and it's worth pointing out that we are moving far more quickly than typical cancer research does! Have a look here: https://imahealth.org/research/cancer-care/ we may have more there than you think
Greg's is known for looking for the critical edge, improvements possible...again not determined your not legit just immediate take...indeed those 5-6 items, supplements mainly good but very pharma beholden with them owning most supp.companies...
There's a gatekeeper of angelic death like hold on the cancer field at a supernatural level preventing logic,reason,progress from occuring beyond mere corruptions I've noticed and felt in my own mind,spirit behaviors when I set myself against it's awesome sickening ,killing powers..things will get blurred,obscured,even demotivated ie research applications even with death on line motivations of self or loved ones..true reaper like stuff if delusion spirit ancient rep.goin on I tell you..so forgive my critisizms where I might be in off too far with you..I only glanced and gave initial potential take..may you do well if your ambitions to heal God's people are true!
Further,there is advantage to a shorter,concise protocol of best that could be handled easier,similar too a short mainstream Drs prescription with exact dosing of less then a half dozen items...
Although full dozen to 2 dozen list will perform better it's no good if majority won't begin it due to complications of it, financing,etc.. ultimately shirt list could heal more at half or less healing power see?
So tailoring important to individual or..ideally offer 3 programs short, medium,long and expensive, finely tuned list and compare results...likely long is going to win it but all on board w 3 tier plan...also you can keep adding to 3rd tier list any and everything which is fun , interesting..if any items begin to outperform 1st tier mainstay you replace that one!-What do you think?
https://Turbocancer.org
RFK NEEDS TO OFFER THESE TO ALL CANCER PATIENTS - THEN SEE RESULTS IN 2-4 YEARS...
THEN STRIP OUT THE CRAP, AND PRESCRIBE THESE, WHEN PROVEN...
Thank you so much for sharing this information. 🙏🏻😌
"Resveratrol" is misspelled in Tables 1 and 3.
Res for short. For those in the know.
Perhaps, but I doubt it's ever "Reservatrol".