The not-so-sweet facts about aspartame
Newly released findings from the World Health Organization (WHO) recommend against the use of non-sugar substitutes. The question is, what took so long?
Guest post by Dr. Suzanne Gazda
Consuming too much sugar has massive pro-inflammatory impacts. Virtually every disease, including neurological conditions, has inflammation at its core. Aspartame (also known by its popular brand name Equal, among others) is a shoddy alternative to replace the sugar in your coffee or other beverages, which I’ve written about before.
Now comes even more evidence as to why this artificial sweetener is so damaging to our neurological well-being and is something that should have been made widely known a long time ago.
Newly released findings from the World Health Organization (WHO) recommend against the use of non-sugar substitutes (NSS) to control body weight or reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). The systematic review concluded that
“use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children. Results of the review also suggest that there may be potential undesirable effects from long-term use of NSS, such as an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and mortality in adults.”
The WHO guidelines on NSS are part of a suite of current and future guidelines regarding healthy diets and the need to establish lifelong healthy eating habits that improve dietary quality, and ideally decrease the risk of NCDs worldwide.
However, we must raise the question that, in the face of enormous evidence that has existed for decades about the danger of aspartame and other food additives, why are these guidelines only now being issued?
Dr. Russell Blaylock is a neurosurgeon who for years has spoken out about the serious health concerns surrounding aspartame. In his book, Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, Blaylock looks in detail at over 500 studies that clearly identify aspartame as being one of the most dangerous yet widely available substances, linked to over 75% of the adverse reactions to food additives as reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) such as:
Migraines
Brain fog
Dizziness
Memory loss
Insomnia
Fatigue
Weight gain
… as well as more serious reactions including seizures and even fatalities.
In an article published on “U.S. Right to Know,” author Stacy Malkin writes about aspartame and the decades of science that point to serious health risks. Malkin notes that aspartame is found in over 6,000 products, from diet sodas and reduced-calorie beverages to chewing gum and candies. But, since aspartame was first introduced in 1974, numerous studies have pointed to its link to diseases such as Alzheimer’s, cancer, stroke, dementia, intestinal dysbiosis, neurotoxicity, and mood disorders, as well as cardiovascular and additional serious conditions.
What’s best for our health is often far down the list of important concerns.
Several years ago, Harvard University advised pregnant women to avoid artificial sweeteners including aspartame, citing a study of 3,000 subjects that indicated the potential for excessive weight gain in the mothers and subsequently in the babies, as well. As we know, obesity can bring with it a host of health issues that can affect many of our bodily systems and contribute to developing other disorders. Even when dietary factors were controlled, there was still a correlation between higher consumption of diet beverages and increased fetal weight.
So, why are we still surrounded by product choices replete with aspartame and harmful additives like monosodium glutamate (MSG), and other non-nutritional chemicals? And why did it take the WHO so long to put forward their recent guidelines? Unfortunately, the answers point to the nature of our economies in this and other countries, the influence of huge corporations, and the immense power of large pharmaceutical companies… which can mean that what’s best for our health is often far down the list of important concerns.
It’s up to each of us to use the information at hand to make the right decisions for ourselves and our loved ones, choosing fresh over processed foods, limiting sugar and other products that can provoke inflammation, trying to get about 7 hours of quality sleep each night, exercising, and getting out in nature. And those are the sweetest things you can do for the sake of your beautiful brain!
In hope and healing,
Dr. Suzanne Gazda
This article was originally published at https://www.suzannegazdamd.com/blog/aspartame-a-toxin-to-avoid-for-your-brains-wellbeing and is reproduced here with the author’s permission.
Dr. Gazda was a speaker at the recent FLCCC conference, ‘Emerging Approaches to Treating Spike Protein-Induced Diseases.’ Register now to view her lecture and gain access to over 12 hours of educational content.
I’ve been telling this too everyone I have discussed diet with since the late 90s/early aughts, when I took biochemistry. People stubbornly refused to consider it necessary to just cut out refined sugar and sweeteners, to train your body to crave healthy carbs and protein, instead of flooding it with artificial chemicals that can often trick your body into releasing insulin, with no concomitant influx of glucose to the bloodstream. This has disastrous metabolic effects and can result in weight gain, as well as the neuroexciting side effects.
I remember seeing Blaylock’s book in Barnes & Noble when it came out. I picked it up, read through it, thought ‘well, makes sense’ and began avoiding MSG, as well.
As for the WHO, there’s a calculation of some kind in their report, for someone to benefit, other than consumers. The question is, who?
Who does the World Homicide Organization represent?
They should mind their own business. I never voted for Bill Gates (owns 40% of WHO).