The Independent Medical Alliance announced today their enthusiastic support for HHS' decision to require placebo-controlled trials for all new vaccines before licensure.
Want to restore confidence in vaccines without out doing any studies? Just repeal the 1986 vaccine safety act and take away all liability protection from the manufacturers. The only vaccines that may need to be tested against a placebo will be a half dozen where the benefits (effectiveness) justify the risks.
NEVER FORGET that they were perfectly happy to maim and kill innocent people for big money. They were lying then and they are lying now. Never trust a SNAKE 🐍
Er, no, not for me, anyway. Pharma and the government lied about pretty much everything. so nope, Trust is gone, never to return. Sounds radical, but so was foisting the jabs on us in the first place. If Pharma lied about what testing they actually did, why would anyone believe test results with placebos? Are they going to pinky swear?
What about all of the currently licensed or EUA-approved Vaccines and Experimental Gene Therapy Injections - which didn't have any inert placebo to compare against, in past trials? What about repeal of the Jab-makers' immunity from proper liability, for their dangerous products?
If we had a re-do of the current ones, they’d all fail. We also need studies on the effect of 72 doses vs. placebo, they’ve in essence been done in vax vs unvaxxed studies.
The reason why a head becomes the kettle of the aluminum: : :
The approximate AL atomicity which enters the body with convention model vaccine
※AL atomic weight = 26.98, density = 2.699 g/cm3
※The number calculation n unit = w [g]/molecular weight * 6e+23 unit
4.175-6.525 mg = 9.3e+19 - 1.45e+20 unit DTaP (for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) *5 time = 1.65 - 3.125mgHib (for influenza bacteria B) *4 time = 0.9mgHepA (for the A hepatitis) *2 time = 0.45 - 0.5mgPCV (for the Streptococcus pneumoniae) *4 time = 0.5 mg that the AL atom of the HepB (for the B hepatitis) *3 time = 0.675-1.5 mg = 1.5e+19 - 3.33e+19 unit enters or more only with five kinds in total
It is exposed to 93,000 quadrillion~ 145,000 quadrillion, on the other hand 1 cell exposed to 2.5 million-3.9 million AL atoms ,total human cell number ≒37 trillion .
※It is thought that AL (-) inhibits Ca (+)dependent film protein. Ca-channel on the cell membrane, K-channel does not work definitely in its turn, too.
IIRC, when the jabs were first rolled out, when people keeled over right there at the jab site, the official mantra was hey, even if it kills you, it is worth it, because everyone else is protected. Take one for the team!
So, again, no. Too little, way too late, and the players are liars. I would not even trust whatever is used as a placebo.
It is going to take a LOT more than placebo controlled trials to restore trust.
Between the COVID bioweapons, and the childhood poison (vaccine) schedule, the breach of trust has been utterly horrific.
Only justice for the dead and the injured, will begin to turn the tide ~ and if the Prep Act and the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act are not repealed, and if the financial incentives for vaccination are not abolished, and if medical sovereignty and informed choice are not restored, and if medical detention centers are not destroyed, trust will NEVER be restored.
Does it mean there will be a requirement for testing in 8 mice with a vaccine/ booster vs 8 mice with a placebo? As opposed to just testing in 8 mice with a vaccine / booster only?
Does it mean testing vaccine in adjuvant vs. placebo adjuvant? Or vaccine vs. saline?
No it should not and it won't. You cannot test your way to safety. Products must be DESIGNED FOR SAFETY. Vaccines are never ever designed. They are developed by incompetent tinkerers. What is the purpose of testing a product that is already KNOWN TO BE UNSAFE?
It is not just the design, but the production as well. Quality control of the Covid injections was non-existent. They were/are allowed to be produced, packaged, and used with lipid-enclosed DNA fragments known to be capable of causing transfection and unknown results due to subsequent un-controlled gene-modification. And even if controlled, the results are still unknown and will be so until reproduction by the individual proves there was or wasn't a change.
You are of course right. My point is if they do the design process right, the vaccine will never go into production! They will find out it is too dangerous.
You cannot undo a jab! Therefore, NO TRUST UNTIL...
1. PREP Act is repealed, jab manufacturers are liable for harms, and Childhood Vaccine Schedule is 100% optional.
2. All vaccines -- old and new -- undergo testing by INDEPENDENT organizations -- not Pharma, not government, not any group with financial conflict of interest.
-- All test data and methods must be made public.
-- Testing must last years, not days, weeks, or months. Many adverse effects aren't revealed right away. It's not good enough to say "no one died right after vaccination, so we'll call it good."
-- Testing of individual jabs also must occur in combination with other jabs often given at the same time.
6. Doctors or others who administer vaccines require potential recipients to take home the FDA Package insert for each planned vaccine, read it thoroughly, take a multi-choice quiz that ensures their informed consent, and then return if they still agree to a jab.
The above is a high bar indeed, but without a high bar, trust shall remain LOW to ZERO.
🔥FDALabel: Full-Text Search of Drug Product Labeling. Web-based application to search labeling documents of FDA-approved drug products: https://nctr-crs.fda.gov/fdalabel/ui/search
If I could give this more likes I would. And none of that is going to happen. Just the minimal amount of public fiddling in an effort to "gain trust". Honestly, since the medical industry is now subsided by the government and controlled by the government and the insurance industry, and the most egregious harm and wrongs are completely unpunished, I do wonder why they care about "trust". More jabs coming down the road? Maybe the revenue from TV-shilled drugs is falling? IMO, just accept that perhaps 80% of the people will willingly submit, and let it go at that.
Thank you so much for your kind multi-likes message, djean111.
Agree with you 100% that government and insurer involvement in "health care" likely will ensure continued dollars spent and "sick care" promoted.
Trust is earned by actions, not messaging, and it'll take decades to undo the decades of deceit, censorship, greed, and harm.
Many -- especially in government -- think "if we just get the messaging right or change a little something here and there, the people will trust us." NOPE! Maybe that works for the many, but that kind of talk raises our spidey 🕷️ hackles (do spidies have hackles? I don't know ;-).
Want to restore confidence in vaccines without out doing any studies? Just repeal the 1986 vaccine safety act and take away all liability protection from the manufacturers. The only vaccines that may need to be tested against a placebo will be a half dozen where the benefits (effectiveness) justify the risks.
Yes, yes, and, again, YES!
NEVER FORGET that they were perfectly happy to maim and kill innocent people for big money. They were lying then and they are lying now. Never trust a SNAKE 🐍
You knew I was a snake when you let me in.
Trump says that to his supporters all the time. With his little snake poem. And STILL they can’t see what he is. Blinded by cult delusion mentality.
Er, no, not for me, anyway. Pharma and the government lied about pretty much everything. so nope, Trust is gone, never to return. Sounds radical, but so was foisting the jabs on us in the first place. If Pharma lied about what testing they actually did, why would anyone believe test results with placebos? Are they going to pinky swear?
It's good - but only as a FIRST STEP.
What about all of the currently licensed or EUA-approved Vaccines and Experimental Gene Therapy Injections - which didn't have any inert placebo to compare against, in past trials? What about repeal of the Jab-makers' immunity from proper liability, for their dangerous products?
It will also end the vaccine industry.
Works for me.
If we had a re-do of the current ones, they’d all fail. We also need studies on the effect of 72 doses vs. placebo, they’ve in essence been done in vax vs unvaxxed studies.
Not to mention the horror of administering multiple vaccines at one time:
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/e9dd86c9d68b
Aluminum exposure far exceeds maximum dose recommended. Crazy!
Aluminum is toxic - there should be no MINIMUM dose.
Correct
The reason why a head becomes the kettle of the aluminum: : :
The approximate AL atomicity which enters the body with convention model vaccine
※AL atomic weight = 26.98, density = 2.699 g/cm3
※The number calculation n unit = w [g]/molecular weight * 6e+23 unit
4.175-6.525 mg = 9.3e+19 - 1.45e+20 unit DTaP (for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) *5 time = 1.65 - 3.125mgHib (for influenza bacteria B) *4 time = 0.9mgHepA (for the A hepatitis) *2 time = 0.45 - 0.5mgPCV (for the Streptococcus pneumoniae) *4 time = 0.5 mg that the AL atom of the HepB (for the B hepatitis) *3 time = 0.675-1.5 mg = 1.5e+19 - 3.33e+19 unit enters or more only with five kinds in total
It is exposed to 93,000 quadrillion~ 145,000 quadrillion, on the other hand 1 cell exposed to 2.5 million-3.9 million AL atoms ,total human cell number ≒37 trillion .
※It is thought that AL (-) inhibits Ca (+)dependent film protein. Ca-channel on the cell membrane, K-channel does not work definitely in its turn, too.
Congratulations on launching your journal.
too late too many deaths &injries
IIRC, when the jabs were first rolled out, when people keeled over right there at the jab site, the official mantra was hey, even if it kills you, it is worth it, because everyone else is protected. Take one for the team!
So, again, no. Too little, way too late, and the players are liars. I would not even trust whatever is used as a placebo.
100%, djean111
I will NEVER trust this cartel.
No way!
It is going to take a LOT more than placebo controlled trials to restore trust.
Between the COVID bioweapons, and the childhood poison (vaccine) schedule, the breach of trust has been utterly horrific.
Only justice for the dead and the injured, will begin to turn the tide ~ and if the Prep Act and the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act are not repealed, and if the financial incentives for vaccination are not abolished, and if medical sovereignty and informed choice are not restored, and if medical detention centers are not destroyed, trust will NEVER be restored.
Hi, thank you for this news.
Please may I clarify what that actually means:
Does it mean there will be a requirement for testing in 8 mice with a vaccine/ booster vs 8 mice with a placebo? As opposed to just testing in 8 mice with a vaccine / booster only?
Does it mean testing vaccine in adjuvant vs. placebo adjuvant? Or vaccine vs. saline?
I hope you can help.
Best wishes,
Paul
They will use 9 mice this time around 😉
No it should not and it won't. You cannot test your way to safety. Products must be DESIGNED FOR SAFETY. Vaccines are never ever designed. They are developed by incompetent tinkerers. What is the purpose of testing a product that is already KNOWN TO BE UNSAFE?
It is not just the design, but the production as well. Quality control of the Covid injections was non-existent. They were/are allowed to be produced, packaged, and used with lipid-enclosed DNA fragments known to be capable of causing transfection and unknown results due to subsequent un-controlled gene-modification. And even if controlled, the results are still unknown and will be so until reproduction by the individual proves there was or wasn't a change.
You are of course right. My point is if they do the design process right, the vaccine will never go into production! They will find out it is too dangerous.
Yes, especially when it utilizes genetic modification.
You cannot undo a jab! Therefore, NO TRUST UNTIL...
1. PREP Act is repealed, jab manufacturers are liable for harms, and Childhood Vaccine Schedule is 100% optional.
2. All vaccines -- old and new -- undergo testing by INDEPENDENT organizations -- not Pharma, not government, not any group with financial conflict of interest.
-- All test data and methods must be made public.
-- Testing must last years, not days, weeks, or months. Many adverse effects aren't revealed right away. It's not good enough to say "no one died right after vaccination, so we'll call it good."
-- Testing of individual jabs also must occur in combination with other jabs often given at the same time.
3. Vaccines are completely optional. No one of any age should be mandated to take any medical intervention for any purpose (see Idaho's 2025 Medical Freedom Act, S1210 - https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2025/legislation/S1210/).
4. Doctors or others who administer vaccines receive no insurance or other incentives (positive or negative).
5. Doctors or others who administer vaccines take and pass a rigorous course such as:
IPAK-EDU Vaccine Course: https://ipak-edu.org/courses/e/Vaccine-Course-c124309252
6. Doctors or others who administer vaccines require potential recipients to take home the FDA Package insert for each planned vaccine, read it thoroughly, take a multi-choice quiz that ensures their informed consent, and then return if they still agree to a jab.
The above is a high bar indeed, but without a high bar, trust shall remain LOW to ZERO.
Some resources:
🔥FDA: VACCINE PACKAGE INSERTS & PRODUCT APPROVALS: https://www.immunize.org/official-guidance/fda/pkg-inserts/
🔥FDALabel: Full-Text Search of Drug Product Labeling. Web-based application to search labeling documents of FDA-approved drug products: https://nctr-crs.fda.gov/fdalabel/ui/search
If I could give this more likes I would. And none of that is going to happen. Just the minimal amount of public fiddling in an effort to "gain trust". Honestly, since the medical industry is now subsided by the government and controlled by the government and the insurance industry, and the most egregious harm and wrongs are completely unpunished, I do wonder why they care about "trust". More jabs coming down the road? Maybe the revenue from TV-shilled drugs is falling? IMO, just accept that perhaps 80% of the people will willingly submit, and let it go at that.
Thank you so much for your kind multi-likes message, djean111.
Agree with you 100% that government and insurer involvement in "health care" likely will ensure continued dollars spent and "sick care" promoted.
Trust is earned by actions, not messaging, and it'll take decades to undo the decades of deceit, censorship, greed, and harm.
Many -- especially in government -- think "if we just get the messaging right or change a little something here and there, the people will trust us." NOPE! Maybe that works for the many, but that kind of talk raises our spidey 🕷️ hackles (do spidies have hackles? I don't know ;-).
Have you guys been working on a document we can present to our Congressmen to ban pharmaceutical advertising. (A legal argument)
It needs to be done.
I will donate 100 dollars toward that effort.