136 Comments
User's avatar
Elyse Young's avatar

I'm so glad you're covering this. Please sign and share this letter campaign to ban DTC pharma ads. Letters will be sent to President Trump, Secretary Kennedy and the FDA Commissioner. https://actionnetwork.org/letters/ban-direct-to-consumer-pharma-ads?source=direct_link&

Big E's avatar

From Action Network website (scroll down): https://actionnetwork.org/

Action Network is an open platform that empowers individuals and groups to organize for progressive causes. We encourage responsible activism, and do not support using the platform to take unlawful or other improper action. We do not control or endorse the conduct of users and make no representations of any kind about them.

Elyse Young's avatar

It's the only platform I've been able to find that lets you send 5,000 free emails a month for a letter campaign. Are you aware of any others that are economical?

Big E's avatar

We don't use mass mail services, instead preferring Substack and occasionally Protonmail for smaller mailings.

You could search for low cost mass email marketing service, like this:

https://www.startpage.com/do/search?q=low+cost+mass+email&segment=startpage.brave

Here's a search result that evaluated several email marketing services: https://www.brevo.com/blog/cheap-email-marketing/

The big concern with many services, especially those with a particular political view (left, right, doesn't matter) is that they often collect email address and other contact information and use it for other purposes such as seeking out donors. It's just something to consider when you choose a mass mail service.

RSgva's avatar

Banning would be best. One solution that occurred to me as an intermediate measure, though, if technology will allow it, is to require all broadcasters to include a “turn off switch“ for anything medical, the way there are turn off switches to protect children.

Il faut savoir ~'s avatar

The insanity is present at Spotify (without subscription) and I go "mute" when it starts and I'm at my desktop; 3 songs and there it is pharma garbage! And then back on knowing that pharma is spending money that doesn't reach!

James Schwartz's avatar

Sent my letter.

Il faut savoir ~'s avatar

Done!

Mrs.  Jenkins's avatar

Thanks for including, signed!

neener's avatar

I did it!

Anna Lafferty's avatar

Done!

Laura Larimore's avatar

Done!

Bonnie Cook's avatar

Thank you for the link. Sent my vote in and have passed the link on

Peter Bell's avatar

But but but can Trump read ?

David Nelson's avatar

He appears to be able to read some writin on walls.

Peter Bell's avatar

I see, he can read toilet walls….that makes sense

Jerry Babbin's avatar

The media have been totally comprised by big pharma as a result of drug advertising.

MRF's avatar

I heard that pharma ads are less designed to promote sales than buy media influence. Since cigarette and alcohol TV ads were banned, it seems that there's precedent to ban pharma ads on grounds of adverse health effects. Most ads include disclaimers of known adverse side-effects.

Dr Dan's avatar

The rule is that if the ad is more than 30 seconds, they have to list the side effects. That is the reason why the ads are so long. It takes an additional minute to read of all the dangers. Including death.

Fred's avatar

The disclaimer are necessary, and exactly why you'll find SIDS, autism, seizures and other adverse effects on the package inserts (if you can find them). Disclosure is required to preserve legal immunity.

David Nelson's avatar

Agree, always good to have Big Media in your corner. (The Miracle is that, even as they flush themselves, Big Dem hasn't--yet--resorted to "interrupting this broadcast" to hose the viewing public with snake oil every five minutes. I would particularly relish hearing the Big Dem spokes"person" detail the risks associated with taking it as true. Too bad their BFF, Big Media, is more focused on whoring after Big Pharmadollars to concern itself with its First Love.)

Masaki Fujii's avatar

The same goes for medical journals. This is especially true of the five most recent US journals. They rely on pharmaceutical advertising.

Doctors who rely on this knowledge are inevitably brainwashed by the pharmaceutical industry.

Fred's avatar

Yep, and explains why every article published on AE's starts with, "it is indisputable that Covid vaccines have saved millions of lives..."

Michael McDonald's avatar

This is incredibly important and I am glad that people have finally been waking up to the fact that Pharma advertising has never been about anything more than buying influence with media companies. If the ban does not happen this year, it will be a major disappointment, given the promises made by RFK, Jr. and DJT. This has been going on for far too long and is a needed step if mainstream media is to have any hope of regaining any of its lost credibility.

Fred's avatar

Agree, but since DTCA has been acceptable for decades, doubt we can stuff that genie back in the bottle. Isn't all advertising "influence peddling" of some sort?

Michael McDonald's avatar

“Acceptable” to whom? Those captured by big pharma $$$ in only two countries on the planet? No one else. And most advertisers actually do so to increase sales.

Fred's avatar

Ha, not me, but I'm not in charge. :) I still don't see a way, constitutionally, to fix this issue. Do you? EO won't do it. Congress too beholden to the $. Bans worked for tobacco, only after decades because of indisputable harms. As much as I'd like to, we can't prove indisputable harms, at least not yet. They're FDA approved, and that's where we need to start IMHO.

VictorDianne Watson's avatar

Just a little aside, Jenna. A friend of ours, in response to, “call your doctor if you have an erection lasting more than 4 hours”, said, “hell no, I’m calling my friends”.😁

Dr Dan's avatar

Besides the "long lasting erection" side effect, my all-time favorite was "oily rectal discharge" from one of the early weight-loss medications. In the package insert, they recommended wearing dark pants just in case!

Tammie RN's avatar

It can't come soon enough! I'm over all of their advertising and Drug pushing 🫸

Rhona  Temple's avatar

Yes. Needs to be done. No drug advertising. We don’t need to know (what is bad for us) what they are peddling. 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Eva Gyllo's avatar

Ha, this was the most hilariously funny piece I’ve read for a long while. So to the point, it had me in stitches!

Well, first of all, all TV stations would suffer financially from a lack of advertising from Pharma. So they won’t want it.

How funny, and to the point of ads in the middle of the program making people believe they have some undisclosed ailment - hilarious, but sadly true.

Our bodies don’t suffer from a lack of chemicals, our bodies suffer from a lack of nutrients. When is that going to enter into the heads of people?

The Pharma industry starting with Rockefeller almost 100 yrs ago have done an excellent job of not only brainwashing the average person, but unfortunately, also our doctors who believe there is a chemical pill for every ill. How this will ever be undone - the million dollar question!

Jenna, the way you write is outstanding, funny, sarcastic, witty and to,the point! Keep it up!

David Nelson's avatar

A little judicious editing will bring this quote into line for competition for 2025 Bumper Sticker of the Year:

"Our bodies don’t suffer from a lack of chemicals, our bodies suffer from a lack of nutrients."

Jenna McCarthy's avatar

Thanks Eva! Day made. :)

Mary Ann Caton's avatar

If we can get ads for tobacco products off the air, we can rid the airwaves of drug ads. Step one: Peter Marks just "resigned."

Fred's avatar

Surely hope so. However, that was because tptb finally (after decades) admitted that tobacco products are dangerous to health. Pharma took its place in the revenue stream. No such proof exists on the pharmaceuticals, so would the courts uphold a ban based solely on influence peddling? IDK.

Fred's avatar

All advertising is influence peddling, right? Still hopeful...

Mary Ann Caton's avatar

Honestly, it's going to be more difficult to remove tv ads from Pharma than it was to remove tobacco if only because Pharma is so much more entrenched in government than tobacco was. As big as tobacco was, it had nothing on Pharma. Maybe I'm just too optimistic about our chances of de-influencing Pharma; they own Congress, the media, and more than half the population.

David Nelson's avatar

Frankly I don't know why "airwaves" aren't on the table.

Laura Larimore's avatar

So glad you're covering this, and in your usual delightful way. I watch a lot of shows on Prime, and by the end of a 45 minute show, I'm kinda feeling left out because I don't take (nor do I think I need) any of the 15 medicines being marketed. I'm wondering if I have a lot of these symptoms and perhaps I just don't recognize them - maybe there's a pharmacological answer for THAT?!

Jessica Byrnes's avatar

Ask your doctor - if you're dumb enough to have one. (a doctor).

David Nelson's avatar

"I'll need to make an exam, please sit on the table and spread your billfold..."

SteveO's avatar

I don't and won't. Natural remedies are much better.

John The Visionary's avatar

No. It's not good for anyone but the doctors and pharmacists.

B Meyer's avatar

In light of the Kennedy Dynasty's mottled track record, I never thought I would be happy to see one of the clan in a position of governmental authority again. But I was wrong. Trump placed RFK in exactly the right position. This is his passion and it is clear that he is a man of integrity, Intelligence, and determination. That he is now reviled by the Democrat Party seals his credentials for me.

WE INTERRUPT THIS POST TO BRING YOU AN IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT:

Have you caught colleagues, friends, and relatives whispering in concerned tones that you've been "asking an awful a lot of questions lately?" Have you been plagued by doubt in the expertise and benevolence of the pharmaceutical industry, government agencies, and even your own doctors? Has your wife caught you at 2 AM staring at the computer, poring over vaccine-related mortality stats, and Reading posts by conspiracy theorists with Irish last names? Then you may be suffering from a dangerous and potentially life-threatening disease called hyperbrainosis, or, in layman's terms, TOO MUCH BRAINS! For the last several months, this disease has been spreading exponentially, and is well on its way to becoming the next global pandemic.

BUT NOT TO FEAR! The selfless Scientists at Pfizer labs have developed a vaccine, NOBRAINSATOL (TM)! Just one dose will not only eliminate all these distressing symptoms, but it will also prevent you transmitting it to others! And unlike other medications, NOBRAINSATOL IS right of EVERYONE! Get your jab today! In fact, to make sure you do, a helpful public healthbot Is standing outside your front door right now!

Judith's avatar

Haha, I’ve got that chronic condition! Now I know what it’s called! 🤣 Hyperbrainosis.

Is there an herb for that? I don’t take drugs. 😉

Anna Lafferty's avatar

I am confident it will happen, Jenna! The momentum is in our favor.

Anna Lafferty's avatar

From what I can see, RFK Jr. is exercising wisdom in his approach. Haven't finished it completely yet (haven't listened to his rant), but I like Del Big Tree's view that he expressed so far on his podcast about the MAHA process - https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1yNxaLMYQQgJj

Curtis's avatar

I used to see a billboard for some kind of prescription drug with a ridiculous name. It didn't even say what it was for!

Justin's avatar

And you drove past it before you could figure out how to pronounce it and avoid hitting the car in front of you (whose driver has slowed down while also trying to pronounce it too). That might be why most medicine names come in 7 letters.

Curtis's avatar

Lol. I saw it every day for several weeks. Just remembered the name; Farxiga... I don't know what it cures, but I'm going to see if I can get some! 😁

Dr Dan's avatar

I always wonder who the marketing team who comes up with these names! There have been times that I have been out of the country for a month or so. When we return, there are so many new drugs that I have to learn about.

David Nelson's avatar

I don't know if you remember the first big push for "Nexium: The Purple Pill" about 20 years ago, with the teevees screaming "Ask YOUR doctor for 'THE PURPLE PILL'," for which an actual malady was not identified for months. No doubt vidiots streamed into offices demanding it, only to be asked, "For what?" and replying, "YOU TELL ME!"

Big Pharma ads are on teevee because, like scumbag spam cold-calling, it works--and...

THERE IS THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM THAT WILL NOT BE ADDRESSED--the STUPIDITY and CUPIDITY OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC.

Upset Grandad's avatar

What a fantastic article! I signed and shared the letter mentioned below also. This is gold. Pure gold. I pray that our President and Secretary Kennedy actually get this done! I absolutely hate (not exaggerating) PFIZER and pharma for destroying this country, our bodies, and our airwaves. Get them the heck off the television!