IMA Weekly Webinar: The 'Yale Study' on Post-Vaccine Syndrome
IMA President Dr. Joseph Varon leads an expert panel to discuss the 'Yale Study' on vaccine-induced spike protein persistence.
NOW STREAMING
WATCH WEBINAR
A groundbreaking new study from Yale has revealed that the spike protein from COVID-19 vaccines can persist in the body for 709 days—over two years—much longer than previously believed. Even more concerning, researchers suggest that many cases of long COVID may actually be post-vaccination syndrome (PVS) caused by lingering vaccine-induced spike protein.
Join us tonight as IMA President & Chief Medical Officer Dr. Joseph Varon hosts IMA Senior Fellows Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Kirk Milhoan, along with researcher Dr. Lynn Fynn to break down this study, its implications, and what it means for those suffering from PVS.
The Yale research challenges the mainstream narrative on vaccine safety and persistence, raising urgent questions about long-term health risks. This discussion will connect the dots between the latest scientific findings and the real-world experiences of those suffering from vaccine-related injuries.
Key topics include:
Persistent spike protein in the body for 709+ days – what does this mean for long-term health?
Immune dysfunction & reactivated viruses – new evidence on Epstein-Barr virus and autoantibodies
Major implications for post-vaccine symptoms – excessive fatigue, brain fog, neuropathy, and more
The urgent need for research & diagnostics – why biomarkers are critical for understanding PVS
📅 When: 7:00pm Eastern / 4:00pm Pacific
🎥 Where: Live on X.com or Rumble
👉 Register now: Get webinar reminders and catch the replay the next day.
🎟️ Get tickets: Join our conference in Atlanta this April (Early bird Pricing Ends THIS FRIDAY, MARCH 7!)
💉 What does this mean for public health? Join us for an urgent discussion on what the latest science reveals—and what must be done moving forward.
In my EHR I can use PVS (post-vaccination(shot) syndrome) because I am not cornered by lack of ICD-10 codes.
So, the opening sentence in this Yale study report is: "COVID-19 vaccines have been instrumental in reducing the impact of the pandemic, preventing severe illness and death, and they appear to protect against long-COVID." Is this even true? ''They" still following that erroneous narrative?
How bad was COVID really? How bad was in-hospital interventions (early intubation, Remdesivir, non-use of repurposed drugs found to be helpful, etc.). How bad was iatrogenic fumbled allopathic care?
Another strike against current medical care. For the entire article please review:
https://news.yale.edu/2025/02/19/immune-markers-post-vaccination-syndrome-indicate-future-research-directions