'Very Unusual' & 'Wildly Speculative': HHR December 8, 2024
A 'very unusual' and successful ‘long shot’ maneuver at the High Court breathes life into the John Stockton-RFK Jr. COVID censorship lawsuit.
Welcome to this week's wrap-up of insights, discussions, discoveries, and debates that have sparked curiosity and fostered understanding this week.
This week: A 'very unusual' and successful ‘long shot’ maneuver at the High Court breathes life into the John Stockton-RFK Jr. COVID censorship lawsuit.
The Negative Effects of Censorship
Censorship in medicine doesn’t just silence inconvenient voices—it restricts the flow of information that could impact your health. Join three FLCCC Senior Fellows, Dr. Kat Lindley, Dr. Scott Jensen, and Dr. Ryan Cole, physicians who have risked their careers by challenging the status quo and defending medical freedom, for an essential discussion on the dangerous consequences of medical censorship.
Censorship during COVID-19 is a stark example of what happens when dissenting voices are stifled. By restricting access to diverse medical perspectives, many were led to believe that the vaccine was the only option, while affordable alternatives like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were vilified despite their strong safety records.
‘Very Unusual’—Supreme Court Revives John Stockton-RFK Jr. COVID Censorship Lawsuit
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Wednesday overrode Justice Elena Kagan in a high-profile First Amendment case involving COVID-19 regulations, basketball legend John Stockton, and putative Donald Trump administration cabinet nominee Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Stockton is the lead plaintiff in the fast-paced litigation that aims to avail the free speech rights of physicians who, in the original petition’s words, “speak out against the mainstream Covid narrative.”
“I think it is very unusual for a renewed application to be granted and to be set for conference… I’d like to think that Justice Thomas understands what a fundamental issue this is and that the Supreme Court needs to tell the country whether there are any limits to medical boards controlling physicians expressing their dissent to government health policies and its view of science.” —Lead attorney Richard “Rick” Jaffe
Esq. Jaffe recently appeared on the FLCCC Weekly Webinar Lawfare Against Doctors
Why Americans are “Embracing Disruptors”
“There is a great awakening… we’re seeing a silver lining to this dark cloud…”
FLCCC newest Senior Fellow, Dr. Scott Jensen, shared why he has hope for the future, highlighting that more Americans are embracing disruptors who challenge mainstream medical narratives, and how the new health administration nominees can impact real change.
Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake—Go There
Courageous Discourse name-checks Dr. Scott Jensen and the MATH+ Hospital Treatment in a brand new wildly speculative Substack:
Yet another (wildly speculative) theory is that the assassin is somehow linked with an intelligence agency that wished to eliminate Thompson because he knows too much about U.S. federal health agency corruption. During the pandemic, Thompson was CEO of UHC’s government programs, including Medicare and retiree coverage, and community and state programs providing Medicaid and other types of coverage to millions of individuals.
Could the CARES Act enhanced payments explain why hospitals insisted on sticking with the NIH’s nihilistic treatment guidelines despite their low success rate? To put it more dreadfully: Could it be that hospitals refused to use the FLCCC’s MATH+ (with ivermectin) protocol precisely because it could work and thereby imperil the 20% enhanced Medicare payment for COVID-19 patients, plus the 20% add-on for administering these patients remdesivir, plus the $39,000 payment for mechanical ventilation?
Help Us Prepare for Bold Action in 2025
Right Around the Corner — FLCCC’s 4th Educational Conference
Connect Without Fear of Censorship
Like what you’ve seen and read in today’s highlights? One thing is for sure, we’ll be talking about it all at the FLCCC Forums. Drop by today and continue the discussion or start a new one.
Thank You For Reading
As always, we’re glad to have you with us. The battle for Honest Medicine rages on!
Here’s how you can help
Truth has nothing to hide, so why all the censorship. It's a no-brainer. Thank you, for all of the Frontline people that dare to tell the truth and expose what's truly happening in our world❤️
The success of Ivermectin had to be quashed because it would’ve been the end of the FDA approving Covid vaccines for emergency use.
The Prep Act states there cannot be an equal or better medicine, easily available, to treat the disease. IVERMECTIN is that medicine.
The “ pushers of the deadly protocols”, knew this prior to Covid vaccines roll out. Most likely, prior to 2019-2020. There were beautiful peer reviewed, double blind studies of Ivermectin, that were surprisingly retracted from several medical journals, for ridiculous reasons. Retractions used to be very rare occurrences.