Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jim Anderson's avatar

I have a friend who works for a Community College in Barstow, California. Because enrollment is so far down, the college is being forced to lay off over 30% of it's staff, so they are trying to offer early retirement, letting go those people who do not have tenure, and not replacing any staff that are leaving. If this does not illustrate the stupidity of forced Vaxx's nothing else does. And, as with Elementary and High School children, no one has clearly shown that the vaccination keeps the disease at bay.

Expand full comment
Lee Muller's avatar

How can one distinguish between Long Haul COVID and adverse vaccine effects? If one adopts the use of Long Haul COVID will that result in underreporting of adverse vaccine effects?

Lawmakers in Congress are proposing to spend in the Cures 2.0 Act (pending 2021-2022): $5 million to study Long COVID, $30 million to educate about long covid symptoms (which are very similar to the flu), $75 million in grants to organizations providing rare disease support, $75 million for strengthening vaccine and immunization programs, and billions in research investment to spark the economy (Sec 502), yet $0 towards aiding patients with serious conditions due to adverse vaccine effects. The word "adverse" is only mentioned once in Sec. 411 Meaningful Access to Federal Health Plan Claims Data.

This is all in addition to the $6.3 billion 21st Century Cures Act (2015-2016) enacted under the Obama Administration which calls for Real World Evidence (Sec. 3022) and other related research through 2026 (and 2023 in particular).

Please help Congress right the wrongs - rightingthewrongs.org

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts