Peer-reviewed research from Drs. Paul Marik and Justus Hope links COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to “turbo cancer,” detailing five biological pathways that may drive aggressive, fast-growing cancers.
So sad what they have done. I’ll hold my breath for an apology for asking common sense questions about what was being forced coerced propagandized into my body, and being vilified for not going along with the mob. So sad.
To my loving mom, who passed within about two months with cancer, and still no one in my family can put the dots together. RIP momma ❤️
Indeed! I wonder if that’s true. The fundamentals seem to be missing from oncology to some degree, there’s no doubt. That’s really a big part of the issue isn’t it?
Thank you isn't enough for all you do, but thank you. I've added this to a curation on Cancer Reversal Protocols (which includes many of your other posts) + Covid Injections & Cancer.
So great to see two heroes of the pandemic collaborating on a paper.
I remember Justus R Hope spreading the news of the great turnaround in India, in dealing with the worst SARS-CoV-2 outbreak the world has ever seen up to then. They went from dumping bodies in the river, to a complete eradication of the virus in a large section of the country, in only a few short months. And he continues to do great work... https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/governments-knew-ivermectin-worked
Dr. Marik really needs no introduction. His Sepsis protocol has been adopted by many ICU's worldwide. Co-founded the FLCCC, and then beat the FDA in court for misrepresenting Ivermectin as a horse paste. Forcing the FDA to remove all misleading posts on this life-saving med... https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/the-fda-has-lost-its-war-on-ivermectin
The five processes could actually be rolled into one if one considers active alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) known to be induced by spike protein/SARS-CoV-2 [Appelberg S, Gupta S, Svensson Akusjärvi S, et al. Dysregulation in Akt/mTOR/HIF-1 signaling identified by proteo-transcriptomics of SARS-CoV-2 infected cells. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):1748-1760. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1799723.] and at the mRNa and protein levels [Prof Ujjwal Neogi personal communication]. That AFP binding to the 67 kD AFP receptor (AFPr) may induce the malignant phenotype was postulated in 1994 in my unified theory of cancer [Laderoute MP, Molecular Carcinogenesis, 1994]. It was established that AFP inhibited all incoming signals including apoptosis (ie., uniquely induced a negative signal) and the macrophages express the 67 kD AFPr while adenocarcinomas overexpress the AFPr [Laderoute MP Ph.D. thesis 1991]. Accordingly AFP could shut down the protector response of macrophages which we now know is the critical trained (innate) immunity response that protects against tumors [Laderoute MP. Trained Innate Immunity: Mechanisms and Meaning. February 10, 2025. Substack article. https://hervk102.substack.com/p/trained-innate-immunity-mechanisms] as well as render the tumor refractory to signal induction importantly promoting apoptosis resistance and metastases. We now know that AFP physically inhibits PTEN which allows the activation of the major malignancy-conferring pathway PI3K-AKT-mTOR which leads to induction of HIF-1 alpha which drives glycolysis. BTW glycolysis via the EGFr is what drives the trained (innate) immunity in macrophages, and should not be viewed as abnormal per se. Also at the time (in 1994) the significance of blocking apoptosis in macrophages was unknown but we now know that this blocks the release and thus the launch of the HERV-K102 protector system which is how trained innate immunity is generated [See Chapter 17, in "Controversies in the Pandemic" 2024.]. Furthermore, AFP mediates immunosenescence of macrophages which causes chronic diseases [Laderoute MP, Discovery Medicine, 2015]. To reverse immunosenescence and/or to clear cancer one must use AFP antagonists to restore the function of foamy macrophages but NOT anti-inflammatories that block macrophage activation. The most potent AFP antagonists are ivermectin, the benzimidazoles, then DHEA (preferably 7 keto-DHEA), genistein (50 to 60 mg), zinc (about 25 mg) and others (arachidonic acid activates AFP for entry into cells but then shuts down AFP expression).
Good idea! I suppose it wouldn't take much to write a short overview on how AFP and the 67 kD AFP receptor that I characterized for my Ph.D. thesis could bundle the five attributes of cancer into one.
"At the Independent Medical Alliance, cancer research isn’t dictated by pharmaceutical shareholders. Our work is guided by one question: What actually helps patients.."
If the goal is to inform patients and enable them to find truth beyond Pharma fraud it is a mystery to me why you insist on calling mRNA TRANSFECTION a vaccine when syringe delivery is the only similarity with products the public recognizes.
Not that traditional jabs to augment the immune system are not built of biological myths and hiding harms but these are 1980's mop & bucket level lab tools used in EVERY medical school and vaccine, virology research area & the only benefit to misnaming TRANSFECTION as Vaccines is to reset IP as novel use to turn this dangerous bench tool into a cash cow. Criminal deception.
We knew from 1999 Biotech Death of Jesse Gelsinger non-self proteins would be catastrophic yet five years on the "medical resistance" can't be honest.
I see what you mean Pamela; but in this case, we are just using common words that people understand. We agree that these are not "vaccines", but rather gene therapies. We aren't being insistent, just trying to ensure people know what we are talking about! People need to be aware of the dangers of these injections, and using common terms just gives us a better chance of reaching more people.
People understand as a result of teaching and refusing to teach is a poor excuse.
TRANSFECTIONS are NOT gene therapy they are a well known widely used tool that properly naming will inform a huge swath of the scientific community that would NEVER TRANSFECT themselves IF products were not misrepresented as vaccines a product they trust as a lifetime of propaganda. You absolutely reach more people BUT you are not educating them you are herding them into another niche of misinformed supporters.
We the public are not stupid and to use simplified cover story is why the CIA puts out stories that censor key details to manage public attitudes and manufacture consensus. There is NEVER a good excuse to lie for some greater good.
Per Pamela Drew's comment, you would be of great service if you choose to educate your readers regarding the reality of transfections - what they are, how they are used. The dangers...
Hi Chad, that's a question that was touched on in our recent webinar: https://imahealth.org/journal-turbo-cancer/ - you'll note Dr. Marik references a Japanese study that correlates the shots with cancer resurgence. We need more research but the Japanese study has been very compelling evidence for our team
My always healthy mom was just diagnosed with cancer in her lungs, and she has a pancreatic tumor pressing against her bile duct causing sepsis. We're still waiting on scrubbing results on the pancreatic situation and staging. She didn't want to get the jab but my brother threatened not to visit with the grandkids without her getting it. No one in her ancestry ever had cancer. Her brother, two years younger, has renal cancer that spread to the lungs and pancreas, and now has Parkinson. He's 78 and she's 79.
Very interesting Ruth, so the idea is that stress could be used as a weapon and then businesses like pharma can sell them the solution to the problem they created. My question: will that be a fiction or a non-fiction?... could go either way!
It’s a tricky thing right. “Peer-reviewed by who?”, one could say. Thats why in our case we only accept papers with zero conflicts of interest attached. And, we ourselves have no conflicts. We’re trying to course correct medical science, truly!
If memory serves, the peer reviewed paper was not rejected by peers or the journal… it was removed because a media “fact-check” blitz was causing a loss of reputation to the journal… to mitigate the PR/marketing damage, the journal pulled the paper
Which paper do you mean Gary? I'd say the media and the corrupt scientific journals were very much in cohoots during COVID-era and very much remain so!
The study, led by Dr Miki Gibo, at the Matsubara Clinic in Kochi, Japan, which found that in 2022 there was a statistically significant rise in deaths from certain cancers coinciding with the rollout of Covid-19 mRNA injections.
Ah yes, covered that one specifically in our most recent webinar: https://imahealth.org/journal-turbo-cancer/ The correlation seems incredibly clear but yet, the study was retracted. Nevertheless, that analysis lives on and we think it should be fair game for review regardless of what the gatekeepers say
So sad what they have done. I’ll hold my breath for an apology for asking common sense questions about what was being forced coerced propagandized into my body, and being vilified for not going along with the mob. So sad.
To my loving mom, who passed within about two months with cancer, and still no one in my family can put the dots together. RIP momma ❤️
VERY SORRY about your BELOVED Mom....
THANK YOU, Dr. Marik!
Thank you to both of you.
Most oncologist have never heard of Otto Warburg.
Indeed! I wonder if that’s true. The fundamentals seem to be missing from oncology to some degree, there’s no doubt. That’s really a big part of the issue isn’t it?
What????? Wow.
Thank you isn't enough for all you do, but thank you. I've added this to a curation on Cancer Reversal Protocols (which includes many of your other posts) + Covid Injections & Cancer.
https://birdseyeviewperspective.substack.com/p/cancer-reversal-protocols-and-dosing
So great to see two heroes of the pandemic collaborating on a paper.
I remember Justus R Hope spreading the news of the great turnaround in India, in dealing with the worst SARS-CoV-2 outbreak the world has ever seen up to then. They went from dumping bodies in the river, to a complete eradication of the virus in a large section of the country, in only a few short months. And he continues to do great work... https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/governments-knew-ivermectin-worked
Dr. Marik really needs no introduction. His Sepsis protocol has been adopted by many ICU's worldwide. Co-founded the FLCCC, and then beat the FDA in court for misrepresenting Ivermectin as a horse paste. Forcing the FDA to remove all misleading posts on this life-saving med... https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/the-fda-has-lost-its-war-on-ivermectin
What a one-two punch we got going here.
The five processes could actually be rolled into one if one considers active alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) known to be induced by spike protein/SARS-CoV-2 [Appelberg S, Gupta S, Svensson Akusjärvi S, et al. Dysregulation in Akt/mTOR/HIF-1 signaling identified by proteo-transcriptomics of SARS-CoV-2 infected cells. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):1748-1760. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1799723.] and at the mRNa and protein levels [Prof Ujjwal Neogi personal communication]. That AFP binding to the 67 kD AFP receptor (AFPr) may induce the malignant phenotype was postulated in 1994 in my unified theory of cancer [Laderoute MP, Molecular Carcinogenesis, 1994]. It was established that AFP inhibited all incoming signals including apoptosis (ie., uniquely induced a negative signal) and the macrophages express the 67 kD AFPr while adenocarcinomas overexpress the AFPr [Laderoute MP Ph.D. thesis 1991]. Accordingly AFP could shut down the protector response of macrophages which we now know is the critical trained (innate) immunity response that protects against tumors [Laderoute MP. Trained Innate Immunity: Mechanisms and Meaning. February 10, 2025. Substack article. https://hervk102.substack.com/p/trained-innate-immunity-mechanisms] as well as render the tumor refractory to signal induction importantly promoting apoptosis resistance and metastases. We now know that AFP physically inhibits PTEN which allows the activation of the major malignancy-conferring pathway PI3K-AKT-mTOR which leads to induction of HIF-1 alpha which drives glycolysis. BTW glycolysis via the EGFr is what drives the trained (innate) immunity in macrophages, and should not be viewed as abnormal per se. Also at the time (in 1994) the significance of blocking apoptosis in macrophages was unknown but we now know that this blocks the release and thus the launch of the HERV-K102 protector system which is how trained innate immunity is generated [See Chapter 17, in "Controversies in the Pandemic" 2024.]. Furthermore, AFP mediates immunosenescence of macrophages which causes chronic diseases [Laderoute MP, Discovery Medicine, 2015]. To reverse immunosenescence and/or to clear cancer one must use AFP antagonists to restore the function of foamy macrophages but NOT anti-inflammatories that block macrophage activation. The most potent AFP antagonists are ivermectin, the benzimidazoles, then DHEA (preferably 7 keto-DHEA), genistein (50 to 60 mg), zinc (about 25 mg) and others (arachidonic acid activates AFP for entry into cells but then shuts down AFP expression).
Very compelling, Marian! Have you formalized any of this into a paper before?
Good idea! I suppose it wouldn't take much to write a short overview on how AFP and the 67 kD AFP receptor that I characterized for my Ph.D. thesis could bundle the five attributes of cancer into one.
"At the Independent Medical Alliance, cancer research isn’t dictated by pharmaceutical shareholders. Our work is guided by one question: What actually helps patients.."
If the goal is to inform patients and enable them to find truth beyond Pharma fraud it is a mystery to me why you insist on calling mRNA TRANSFECTION a vaccine when syringe delivery is the only similarity with products the public recognizes.
Not that traditional jabs to augment the immune system are not built of biological myths and hiding harms but these are 1980's mop & bucket level lab tools used in EVERY medical school and vaccine, virology research area & the only benefit to misnaming TRANSFECTION as Vaccines is to reset IP as novel use to turn this dangerous bench tool into a cash cow. Criminal deception.
We knew from 1999 Biotech Death of Jesse Gelsinger non-self proteins would be catastrophic yet five years on the "medical resistance" can't be honest.
https://web.archive.org/web/20121025034826/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/28/magazine/the-biotech-death-of-jesse-gelsinger.html
I see what you mean Pamela; but in this case, we are just using common words that people understand. We agree that these are not "vaccines", but rather gene therapies. We aren't being insistent, just trying to ensure people know what we are talking about! People need to be aware of the dangers of these injections, and using common terms just gives us a better chance of reaching more people.
People understand as a result of teaching and refusing to teach is a poor excuse.
TRANSFECTIONS are NOT gene therapy they are a well known widely used tool that properly naming will inform a huge swath of the scientific community that would NEVER TRANSFECT themselves IF products were not misrepresented as vaccines a product they trust as a lifetime of propaganda. You absolutely reach more people BUT you are not educating them you are herding them into another niche of misinformed supporters.
We the public are not stupid and to use simplified cover story is why the CIA puts out stories that censor key details to manage public attitudes and manufacture consensus. There is NEVER a good excuse to lie for some greater good.
Per Pamela Drew's comment, you would be of great service if you choose to educate your readers regarding the reality of transfections - what they are, how they are used. The dangers...
Is there a quick accurate way to prove your cancer is caused by vaccine? Because my mom’s cancer came back after the shot.
Hi Chad, that's a question that was touched on in our recent webinar: https://imahealth.org/journal-turbo-cancer/ - you'll note Dr. Marik references a Japanese study that correlates the shots with cancer resurgence. We need more research but the Japanese study has been very compelling evidence for our team
My always healthy mom was just diagnosed with cancer in her lungs, and she has a pancreatic tumor pressing against her bile duct causing sepsis. We're still waiting on scrubbing results on the pancreatic situation and staging. She didn't want to get the jab but my brother threatened not to visit with the grandkids without her getting it. No one in her ancestry ever had cancer. Her brother, two years younger, has renal cancer that spread to the lungs and pancreas, and now has Parkinson. He's 78 and she's 79.
Here is the pre-print I’d like to submit for publication…
https://osf.io/preprints/osf/ghty9_v1
I’ve been having technical difficulties with the online submission system for the Independent journal of medicine’s website.
I sent my research article directly to the submission email, but haven’t gotten a response back yet.
Is there anyone I can reach out to for help with this situation?
Hey Matt - have you made an account on the journal site? Once you do that, you'd head here: https://journalofindependentmedicine.org/submit-paper/ and fill out the form. If that's not working, no worries, send our journal team a message here: https://journalofindependentmedicine.org/contact/
Very interesting Ruth, so the idea is that stress could be used as a weapon and then businesses like pharma can sell them the solution to the problem they created. My question: will that be a fiction or a non-fiction?... could go either way!
exactly, could be a caper :-)
It’s a tricky thing right. “Peer-reviewed by who?”, one could say. Thats why in our case we only accept papers with zero conflicts of interest attached. And, we ourselves have no conflicts. We’re trying to course correct medical science, truly!
If memory serves, the peer reviewed paper was not rejected by peers or the journal… it was removed because a media “fact-check” blitz was causing a loss of reputation to the journal… to mitigate the PR/marketing damage, the journal pulled the paper
Which paper do you mean Gary? I'd say the media and the corrupt scientific journals were very much in cohoots during COVID-era and very much remain so!
The study, led by Dr Miki Gibo, at the Matsubara Clinic in Kochi, Japan, which found that in 2022 there was a statistically significant rise in deaths from certain cancers coinciding with the rollout of Covid-19 mRNA injections.
Ah yes, covered that one specifically in our most recent webinar: https://imahealth.org/journal-turbo-cancer/ The correlation seems incredibly clear but yet, the study was retracted. Nevertheless, that analysis lives on and we think it should be fair game for review regardless of what the gatekeepers say