Interesting point! Which raises the question. Are our government pharmacovigilance systems able to detect what you describe? My suspicion is absolutely not!
The mechanisms of action of m1Ψ-mRNA and the various LNPs (PEGs) used for delivery are fundamentally unknown.
While E. coli culture methods suggest that mixed E. coli DNA, E. coli plasmid DNA, and fragments are reverse-transcribed into some poisition of human DNA (3 billion base pairs), the exact positions are considered entirely random. The highly toxic E. coli endotoxin is also present.
On the other hand, VAERS-Code can only define things with known causal relationships.
It's impossible to define things with unknown causal relationships in a Code.
Injecting a substance into the bloodstream, falsely labeled as a vaccine, when the potential side effects were completely unknown, was a grave mistake.
In March/April 2020, when this potential vaccines was already in the news, a number of people (myself included) simply did not trust what was known to be an experimental vaccine. That sets the context for why the fear had to be drummed up. As I often say, fear-mongering is an essential element of persuading people to accept toxic interventions.
Email I just got today from Kaiser Permanente (BTW: they recommend Covid shots for infants 6 months, pregnant and lactating women):
———
If you are 65 or older or have a weakened immune system, you are at higher risk for serious illness from COVID-19. The good news is that updated COVID-19 vaccines are available, safe, and are designed to give you stronger protection against severe illness, hospitalization, and death.
Getting vaccinated can help protect your health, keep you out of the hospital, and allow you to safely enjoy time with family and friends.
When the general public hears criticisms about VAERS, they accept them in the way they are framed by the media and the medical/pharmaceutical industry: VAERS is unreliable; therefore, claims of harm from vaccines are exaggerated.
In reality, the opposite is true. Claims of harm reveal just a tiny portion of actual harms.
I would like to see that when reports do not have core info like age, sex, onset intervals and even drugs they are on, that the companies are fined until such information becomes available. I found Pfizer is slack on these parameters almost intentional to wipe out the strength of the signal while Moderna was much more comprehensive in filling out the reports.
Thank you Dr. Rose in explaining what https://www.vaersaware.com/entire-vaers-1990-current has been doing for the last 5 years. DATA CLEANSING and ability to toggle back and forth between unedited and "ethically cleansed" data.
Dear Dr Rose, I humbly implore you to collaborate with other active and experienced researchers and activists who are scrubbing the dirt from the data on an ongoing basis.
While I am not a big fan of AI I understand it offers value at times. What it finds will still have to be verified by humans but it can find some data that is hard work for humans. In any event the results of the ETHICAL updates that have already been made with the data could be used as IDEAL training data to start flagging new entries.
Thank you Closed VAERS and other VAERS activists as well as Dr Rose for all your passionate activism. It is desperately needed and graciously accepted by thousands and will help billions of souls down the line.
These things are designed this way on purpose. Imagine you are a company creating deadly products that are toxic poisons and you need to convince the regulators, doctors, medical mafia and the public that they are perfectly safe and effective. They only way to do that is to LIE and present evil propaganda that few ever question. Welcome to the most perverted sector of companies ever...big pharma.
Pharma has always been like that. The difference today is that we know they are part of the Epstein class; and everyone who they pay off in terms of politicians, agencies, medical personnel, etc are all working for the Epstein class.
Harm is also buried in clinical trials for new vaccines because of the increased background rates of chronic disease caused by prior vaccines.
That was always my thought: they were comparing adverse event rates in test subjects against background rates of a seriously damaged population.
Interesting point! Which raises the question. Are our government pharmacovigilance systems able to detect what you describe? My suspicion is absolutely not!
Yes, it further underscores the need for a completely unvaxxed cohort for comparison.
Well Henry Ford and Mawson for example are a step in that direction...
Dr. Jessica Rose, you are amazing! Incredible work. Thank you so much.
Great work! …glad that you honest and careful pros are still hammering away at the dangerous corruption that has become so prominent.
The mechanisms of action of m1Ψ-mRNA and the various LNPs (PEGs) used for delivery are fundamentally unknown.
While E. coli culture methods suggest that mixed E. coli DNA, E. coli plasmid DNA, and fragments are reverse-transcribed into some poisition of human DNA (3 billion base pairs), the exact positions are considered entirely random. The highly toxic E. coli endotoxin is also present.
On the other hand, VAERS-Code can only define things with known causal relationships.
It's impossible to define things with unknown causal relationships in a Code.
Injecting a substance into the bloodstream, falsely labeled as a vaccine, when the potential side effects were completely unknown, was a grave mistake.
em-PHA-sis on "grave".
In March/April 2020, when this potential vaccines was already in the news, a number of people (myself included) simply did not trust what was known to be an experimental vaccine. That sets the context for why the fear had to be drummed up. As I often say, fear-mongering is an essential element of persuading people to accept toxic interventions.
Thank you!
The VAERs database design was intentional, intentionally bad. RDBMS Design was well known by then (Chris Date and Fabian Pascal).
Email I just got today from Kaiser Permanente (BTW: they recommend Covid shots for infants 6 months, pregnant and lactating women):
———
If you are 65 or older or have a weakened immune system, you are at higher risk for serious illness from COVID-19. The good news is that updated COVID-19 vaccines are available, safe, and are designed to give you stronger protection against severe illness, hospitalization, and death.
Getting vaccinated can help protect your health, keep you out of the hospital, and allow you to safely enjoy time with family and friends.
Click on this link (http://kp.org/appointmentticket) to schedule an appointment for your COVID-19 vaccine.
They want you permanently like the Kaiser.
Tell them to show you the studies that prove what they claim. Betcha get zilch.
Socialists don’t rely on facts and data.
I recall my instructor in Pharm Tech school indicating that VAERS didn't work (that was 16 years ago).
very interesting!
When the general public hears criticisms about VAERS, they accept them in the way they are framed by the media and the medical/pharmaceutical industry: VAERS is unreliable; therefore, claims of harm from vaccines are exaggerated.
In reality, the opposite is true. Claims of harm reveal just a tiny portion of actual harms.
You don’t see what you don’t look for.
I would like to see that when reports do not have core info like age, sex, onset intervals and even drugs they are on, that the companies are fined until such information becomes available. I found Pfizer is slack on these parameters almost intentional to wipe out the strength of the signal while Moderna was much more comprehensive in filling out the reports.
Thank you for your work.
There are not many like you.
So a big thank you for all you do.
Thank you Dr. Rose in explaining what https://www.vaersaware.com/entire-vaers-1990-current has been doing for the last 5 years. DATA CLEANSING and ability to toggle back and forth between unedited and "ethically cleansed" data.
Dear Dr Rose, I humbly implore you to collaborate with other active and experienced researchers and activists who are scrubbing the dirt from the data on an ongoing basis.
While I am not a big fan of AI I understand it offers value at times. What it finds will still have to be verified by humans but it can find some data that is hard work for humans. In any event the results of the ETHICAL updates that have already been made with the data could be used as IDEAL training data to start flagging new entries.
Thank you Closed VAERS and other VAERS activists as well as Dr Rose for all your passionate activism. It is desperately needed and graciously accepted by thousands and will help billions of souls down the line.
These things are designed this way on purpose. Imagine you are a company creating deadly products that are toxic poisons and you need to convince the regulators, doctors, medical mafia and the public that they are perfectly safe and effective. They only way to do that is to LIE and present evil propaganda that few ever question. Welcome to the most perverted sector of companies ever...big pharma.
Pharma has always been like that. The difference today is that we know they are part of the Epstein class; and everyone who they pay off in terms of politicians, agencies, medical personnel, etc are all working for the Epstein class.
How can Dr. Rose know if this has come to the attention of Mr. Robert Kennedy and MAHA?
Shouldn't autopsies be mandatory for any vaccine related death in children?
Great work once again Dr. Rose! Hope it happens to land on the desk of Bobby Kennedy and his team. Thank
You for your continued efforts in behalf of humanity.