IMA doctors celebrate HHS and FDA’s decision to revoke emergency use authorization for COVID-19 mRNA shots, calling it the first step in reckoning with the damage caused by forced mandates.
maybe what we see over the table, but I'd be shocked if pHarmaCo didn't know before submitting products to the Fooled and Drugged Agency that said rubber stamp was going to be the outcome.
after all, they pay something like 75% of agency approval overhead in bribes that aren't admitted to be bribes.
an aging statistic which is likely worse post-convid...
They were still being marketed under EUAs? Seriously? My son was forced to take them in order to continue to attend college because according to State Law, they would become mandatory once any single one of them was approved. And the Pfizer one was approved in September. This was back in 2021. How are EUAs still in force if they were already approved? Or were they never approved? Please explain this to me.
Yeah, he’s fine, thank goodness. I knew they weren’t a good idea since they came out so I did everything I could to get that crap out of him, but still… I can’t believe they even lied about that. Because my son’s ok, but millions of college students are not. Just makes my blood boil, honestly. And it just makes me think that this new “development” is just more bread and circus in this superbly well-orchestrated theatrical 💩show.
"Revoke" is not also a negation? Do you refer to some psychological phenomenon in which the subconscious disregards negations; taking them instead as affirmations?
I suspect the whole trickery of induced consent just be distraction while coercing with the other hand. More to the point, how does one reject coercive persuasion without appearing antisocial or mentally ill? Is the alleged "consent" buried in some oath was induced to take, perhaps as banal as reciting the Pledge of Allegiance, or signing (sinning?) some government form such as a tax return or application for "benefits"? Will the revocation of consent cost you your car (or at least permission to drive it on public highways), Social Security payments, etc.?
No, it is not also a negation. It is an action. And it is more about what happens at the energetic level, and also about how they trick or coerce us into consenting… to everything. I explain it better here:
And no, revoking your consent doesn’t mean you’ll lose everything, because you can consent to what you do want. Admittedly, the system is very adept at keeping us trapped. But we’re the ones who are holding it up, by consenting to all their crap. It’s tricky, I know, but it’s doable if we all walk out, together.
It is nice to see Father accepting Robert Malone's repentence as the 2nd most chronologically liable WIPO🌐 invention (1997) with wife Jill. We have a forgiving Father. The last steps involve ROBERT MALONE, PETER McCULLOUGH and my agency implicating the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) 1993 global patents 4 years earlier. GSK merged with Pfizer's medical division in [Covid] 2019 of all years, part of the Federal Reserve's master plan. It's now pin the bankers not America or the fall couple may be Ethel and Julius part 2, guess who?
Interesting… Thank you for this information. I did not know GSK was the original patent holder and also did not know it had merged with Pfizer. Do you know if this patent was licensed to Moderna or if Moderna”s patented sequence is different from GSK/Pfizer’s?
YAY!!!!!
Finally! Thank goodness! From now on, they will be liable, so the jabs are not so likely to be pushed on people.
And what about mRNA-based RSV and flu shots currently being marketed? Are those approved or under an EUA as well? I’m really confused.
they were given the RubberStampOfApproval™ based on the federal acceptance of mRNA in the convid shots. so, not EUA.
🤦🏻♀️ The approval process is getting alarmingly shorter. I believe it’s down to 30-90 days, from 10-15 years. 😮💨
maybe what we see over the table, but I'd be shocked if pHarmaCo didn't know before submitting products to the Fooled and Drugged Agency that said rubber stamp was going to be the outcome.
after all, they pay something like 75% of agency approval overhead in bribes that aren't admitted to be bribes.
an aging statistic which is likely worse post-convid...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2018/06/28/the-biopharmaceutical-industry-provides-75-of-the-fdas-drug-review-budget-is-this-a-problem/
Of course they knew… it’s in their best interest to rubberstamp all of them. Huge, huge profit-making scheme.
Good .there is no emergency .Hopefully this will apply in Canada and the rest of the world .Thank you IMA 🇨🇦❤️
They were still being marketed under EUAs? Seriously? My son was forced to take them in order to continue to attend college because according to State Law, they would become mandatory once any single one of them was approved. And the Pfizer one was approved in September. This was back in 2021. How are EUAs still in force if they were already approved? Or were they never approved? Please explain this to me.
How is your son's health today? Is everything OK?
Yeah, he’s fine, thank goodness. I knew they weren’t a good idea since they came out so I did everything I could to get that crap out of him, but still… I can’t believe they even lied about that. Because my son’s ok, but millions of college students are not. Just makes my blood boil, honestly. And it just makes me think that this new “development” is just more bread and circus in this superbly well-orchestrated theatrical 💩show.
Agree :/
Do not consent! See my comment re: "mandates".
A bit of unrequested advice: Say “I revoke my consent” instead of “I do not consent”. More info on why here:
https://open.substack.com/pub/apapacharte/p/they-took-our-light-were-taking-it-2b7?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
"Revoke" is not also a negation? Do you refer to some psychological phenomenon in which the subconscious disregards negations; taking them instead as affirmations?
I suspect the whole trickery of induced consent just be distraction while coercing with the other hand. More to the point, how does one reject coercive persuasion without appearing antisocial or mentally ill? Is the alleged "consent" buried in some oath was induced to take, perhaps as banal as reciting the Pledge of Allegiance, or signing (sinning?) some government form such as a tax return or application for "benefits"? Will the revocation of consent cost you your car (or at least permission to drive it on public highways), Social Security payments, etc.?
No, it is not also a negation. It is an action. And it is more about what happens at the energetic level, and also about how they trick or coerce us into consenting… to everything. I explain it better here:
https://open.substack.com/pub/apapacharte/p/they-took-our-light-were-taking-it?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
And no, revoking your consent doesn’t mean you’ll lose everything, because you can consent to what you do want. Admittedly, the system is very adept at keeping us trapped. But we’re the ones who are holding it up, by consenting to all their crap. It’s tricky, I know, but it’s doable if we all walk out, together.
This is great news!!! YAY!!
Yes! Finally! Now may reckoning day come for those who pushed the narrative. Time for all the injured to be compensated!
בְּסִיַּעְתָּא דִּשְׁמַיָּא
It is nice to see Father accepting Robert Malone's repentence as the 2nd most chronologically liable WIPO🌐 invention (1997) with wife Jill. We have a forgiving Father. The last steps involve ROBERT MALONE, PETER McCULLOUGH and my agency implicating the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) 1993 global patents 4 years earlier. GSK merged with Pfizer's medical division in [Covid] 2019 of all years, part of the Federal Reserve's master plan. It's now pin the bankers not America or the fall couple may be Ethel and Julius part 2, guess who?
1
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO1993023421A1/en
2
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO1993023422A1/en
Hear me clearly,
Geoff Wexler,
Legal Link Confidential
https//WHOtoSTOP.com
https://TurboCancer.org
Interesting… Thank you for this information. I did not know GSK was the original patent holder and also did not know it had merged with Pfizer. Do you know if this patent was licensed to Moderna or if Moderna”s patented sequence is different from GSK/Pfizer’s?
Thank god!! A long time coming, but here at last! Thank you, RFK!
The gallows and the guillotine = real reckoning. Mercy to the murderers and mutilators is an insult to their millions of voiceless victims.
"Forced mandates" are a contradiction in terms. Did you mean edicts?
https://americasbestpics.com/picture/mandate-legal-definition-blacks-law-dictionary-11th-ed-mandate-4-vOWnF1KB9
From a retired professor at the University of Michigan 2023/8/24 Duration: 1:57
https://rumble.com/v3b5ib2-mandates-are-not-law-we-do-not-comply.html